With the release of a new invention - thermal sweat, the life of users has become much simpler and more economical. Lower energy costs, large volumes of water, as well as the ability to retain heat for several hours after heating. But is it really so? The information described below will reveal not only the principle of operation and design features of the thermal sweat, but also answer the main question: what is better to choose - a kettle or a thermal sweat?
Content
The main differences
Many users know how an electric kettle works. Under the influence of an electric current, a heating element is triggered, and the water in the device boils. The device turns off on its own.
But what is a thermal sweat? Both externally and structurally, the device is very similar to an electric kettle. But it has a number of individual features:
- Due to the internal coating of a special material, hot water retains heat for several hours after heating.
- The volume of the device is larger, which allows you to boil more water at a time. The device holds up to 5 liters of water.
- The power of the device is less than that of an electric kettle, so the heating of the liquid is slower. But at the same time, certain energy savings are ensured.
The main difference between the thermal sweat is the presence of an automatic mode. This means that this device after heating the water will automatically turn on and maintain the set temperature of the liquid. This property is very convenient for a large team or family with more than four people.
Some models (newer) allow you to set the desired temperature for heating the liquid. This function makes the thermal sweat popular, it allows you to slightly warm the water, knowing that at a certain temperature level the device will turn off.
What is more profitable to use
What is more economical - a kettle or a thermal sweat? To determine the benefits of the device, an analogy should be drawn between the technical characteristics of an electric kettle and a thermal sweat.
How much electricity does an electric kettle with a volume of 1.5 to 1.7 liters and a power of 2.3 kW consume? Such a device consumes about 1.5 kW / h per week. This is provided if the user resorts to the services of an electrical appliance no more than once a day.
The average power of the thermal sweat is 0.8 kW; it carries out heating of four liters of water in 13 minutes. Also, the ability to automatically maintain the temperature should be added to the readings. In order for the temperature of the liquid to remain within 90 degrees, the heating element uses 0.45 kW / h in 15 hours. We add these indications to the initial heating and at the exit, we get about 1 kW / h per day, for the week - 7 kW / h.
Following the above calculations, we can conclude that it is more profitable to use an ordinary electric kettle than a thermal sweat.
The main disadvantages of devices
Is the thermal sweat comfortable for continuous use? In addition to its positive qualities, both an electric kettle and a thermal sweat have certain disadvantages. To make the right choice, the user must know them.
Thermopot is considered the main drawback of its impressive dimensions. It is designed up to 5 liters of water, so it has rather large dimensions. For an ordinary average kitchen, installing a thermal sweat will create additional discomfort. Ideal such a device will look in the office or any other work team.Also, a large volume and low power lead to prolonged heating of the device.
The case of the thermal sweat heats up quickly, as it consists of plastic components and transfers heat to the outside. If the room has small dimensions, then this drawback becomes very noticeable.
Now a large number of fakes have appeared on the world market. They are characterized by an unpleasant smell of plastic after heating the water, a longer period of time required for heating the liquid, as well as greater energy consumption.
The electric kettle has a wide variety of cases. It can be ceramics, metal, glass. In addition, this device consumes more power at a time, which can be overhead for the user. Water in such a kettle quickly gives off heat and requires heating after a minimum period of time.
Thermal Sweat Rating
The best models of thermal sweets will help the user make a choice, show the strengths and weaknesses of the best manufacturers of household appliances and which thermal sweat is better.
Lumme LU-298
A reliable device that has a lot of positive reviews. The volume of 3.2 liters is enough not only for the staff, but also for customer service. The device consists of stainless steel, which positively affects the durability of the device. For a long period of time, it retains water in a given temperature regime.
Panasonic NC-HU301
Panasonic still maintains a good standard in the global home appliance market. The disadvantages of the model Panasonic NC-HU301 include poorly composed operating instructions for the device. The device has several basic modes, which the user can choose independently.
Mystery MTP-2450
Some users mark this device as the most convenient for feeding infants. Mystery MTP-2450 is different in quality from the company Bosh, but it has low power consumption and constantly maintains water in the same temperature range.
REDMOND RTP-M801
The Redmond RTP-M801 model has not only good technical characteristics, but also an attractive design. The wide functionality of the device, the use of high-quality components, as well as beautiful lighting will help the user make the right choice.
SUPRA TPS-3004
Reasonable price, fast boiling time of the liquid and maintaining the set temperature make this device the most famous in the market of household appliances. Among the shortcomings, interruptions in work were noticed, but insignificant.
findings
The above information helps to answer the main question of the article: which is better - an electric kettle or a thermal sweat? Pros and cons of devices will help the user make the right choice and decide on the purchase of an electric kettle or thermal sweat.
 |  |  |  |  |
|
| Navaniy | Lumme LU-298 | Panasonic NC-HU301 | Mystery MTP-2450 | REDMOND RTP-M801 | SUPRA TPS-3004 |
| Volume | 3.2 l | 3 l | 4.5 l | 3.5 l | 5 l |
| Pump | manual | auto | auto | manual / automatic | auto |
| Body material | metal (double walls) | metal / plastic | metal (double walls) | metal (double walls) | plastic (double walls) |
| Security | water lock | water lock | water lock | - | cover lock |
| Price | from 1980 rub. | from 8100 rub. | from 2900 rub. | from 4900 rub. | from 2400 rub. |
